848 (1988 & Supp. Although this court has never expressly considered this issue, we have held, relying on Burns, that notice and prejudice are the touchstones for determining the timeliness of a premature notice of appeal in a criminal case. 732, 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977). 3284, 111 L.Ed.2d 792 (1990). The jury found the defendants guilty of conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute cocaine and heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. 12, even assuming what you proffer about the scowling, that would be different because it's not really an exchange of non-verbal communication. at 92 (record citations omitted). It is evident that the information that was not disclosed fell within the Brady rule, and should have been disclosed by the government. Atty., Allison D. Burroughs, Joel M. Friedman, Abigail R. Simkus, Asst. Robert J. Rebstock (argued), Louis T. Savino, Jr., Louis T. Savino & Associates, Philadelphia, PA, for appellant Bernard Fields. You're all set! 848 (1988 & Supp. at 92. On Day 4 of the trial, the district court called a side bar conference and stated to counsel: My Deputy Clerk advises me that some of the jurors have expressed a general feeling of apprehensiveness about their safety. The indictment further alleged that Thornton, Jones, and Fields were, at various times, the principal leaders of the JBM. United States., 1 F.3d 149 Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. bryan moochie'' thornton. The jury found Fields not guilty of one count of using a firearm during a drug trafficking offense, Under the Rule, "Two or more defendants may be charged in the same indictment or information if they are alleged to have participated in the same act or transaction or in the same series of acts or transactions constituting an offense or offenses. . Sec. denied, 488 U.S. 910, 109 S. Ct. 263, 102 L. Ed. Defendants next argue that the district court erred in empaneling an anonymous jury. Precedential, Citations: As one court has persuasively asserted. at 93. 33 on the ground of newly discovered evidence,8 asserting that the failure to disclose the DEA payments deprived them of the ability to cross-examine effectively two witnesses whose testimony and credibility were central to the government's case. Bay Minette Police Department. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Individual voir dire is unnecessary and would be counterproductive." [126 0 R 127 0 R 128 0 R 129 0 R 130 0 R 131 0 R 132 0 R 133 0 R] 91-00570-03. United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. App. denied, 475 U.S. 1046, 106 S. Ct. 1263, 89 L. Ed. <>/Border[0 0 0]/Contents(Masthead Logo Link)/Rect[72.0 648.0 126.0 707.5]/StructParent 1/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>> denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. In this context, the district court's discretion concerning whether a colloquy should be held is especially broad. Player Combine on April 11; Live Draft Airing April 12 on FS1. 0000014613 00000 n
App. App. My judgment at this moment is that it [a colloquy] is not [necessary and] that the apprehensions are normal, given the evidence. [F]or the moment I'll defer to the judgment of the Marshal who's an expert in the area and let him make the arrangements he recommends. Nonetheless, not every failure to disclose requires reversal of a conviction. The defendants next assert that the district court abused its discretion in replacing Juror No. Before: SLOVITER, Chief Judge, NYGAARD and WEIS, Circuit Judges. 263, 102 L.Ed.2d 251 (1988); see also Eufrasio, 935 F.2d at 574. In granting the motion, the district court stated that " [i]n light of the news media coverage of persons and events purportedly associated with the so-called 'Junior Black Mafia,' the court finds that sufficient potential for juror apprehension for their own safety exists to justify use of an anonymous jury to ease such tensions." He appeared in numerous Disney projects between 1957 and 1963, frequently as an irrepressible character with the nickname Moochie. Government of the Virgin Islands v. Dowling, 814 F.2d 134, 137 (3d Cir.1987). On Day 13 of the trial, the government informed the court that a United States Marshal had observed "visual communication" between Juror No. Eufrasio, 935 F.2d at 568 (quotation and emphasis omitted). 4/21/92 Tr. Gerald A. Stein (argued), Philadelphia, PA, for . We review the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict winner, in this case the government. The court declined the government's request to question Juror No. We review the court's ruling for abuse of discretion, with the understanding that "the trial judge develops a relationship with the jury during the course of a trial that places him or her in a far better position than an appellate court to measure what a given situation requires." [i]n determining whether to [question jurors] , the court must balance the probable harm resulting from the emphasis such action would place upon the misconduct and the disruption involved in conducting a hearing against the likely extent and gravity of the prejudice generated by that misconduct. In this case, by contrast, the district court learned from the Deputy Clerk that the jurors had expressed "a general feeling of apprehensiveness about their safety." Where the district court applies the correct legal standard, its "weighing of the evidence merits deference from the Court of Appeals, especially given the difficulty inherent in measuring the effect of a non-disclosure on the course of a lengthy trial covering many witnesses and exhibits." at 2378. 929 F.2d at 970. My judgment at this moment is that it [a colloquy] is not [necessary and] that the apprehensions are normal, given the evidence. [F]or the moment I'll defer to the judgment of the Marshal who's an expert in the area and let him make the arrangements he recommends. The district court ordered the trial of these three defendants to be severed from the remaining defendants, and then denied motions by Thornton and Jones for separate trials. We understand the government's brief to explain that the prosecutors themselves did not know of the DEA payments to the witnesses. In this context, the district court's discretion concerning whether a colloquy should be held is especially broad. S.App. 880, 88 L.Ed.2d 917 (1986), but we believe these cases support the government. Gerald A. Stein (argued), Philadelphia, PA, for appellant Aaron Jones. 2d 251 (1988); see also Eufrasio, 935 F.2d at 574. 125 0 obj P. 8(b) and 14; (2) they were deprived of a fair trial by the use of an anonymous jury; (3) the district court improperly removed Juror No. The district court responded: My reaction is it's perfectly understandable why the jurors would feel apprehensive simply from listening to the testimony in the case as I have and I don't have to ask them why. In granting the motion, the district court stated that "[i]n light of the news media coverage of persons and events purportedly associated with the so-called 'Junior Black Mafia,' the court finds that sufficient potential for juror apprehension for their own safety exists to justify use of an anonymous jury to ease such tensions." denied, 445 U.S. 953, 100 S. Ct. 1605, 63 L. Ed. Eufrasio, 935 F.2d at 568 (quotation and emphasis omitted). at 874, 1282, 1334, 1516. See Eufrasio, 935 F.2d at 567. 725, 731, 88 L.Ed.2d 814 (1986); see also Eufrasio, 935 F.2d at 567 ("As long as the crimes charged are allegedly a single series of acts or transactions, separate trials are not required."). Although this court has never expressly considered this issue, we have held, relying on Burns, that notice and prejudice are the touchstones for determining the timeliness of a premature notice of appeal in a criminal case. See, e.g., United States v. Minicone, 960 F.2d 1099, 1110 (2d Cir. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 0000005954 00000 n
I'm inclined to follow [the Marshal's] advice and not make a big deal out of it. We review the district court's ruling for abuse of discretion and must be "particularly deferential" to the district court's "substantial discretion" to empanel an anonymous jury. This case has been cited by other opinions: The following opinions cover similar topics: CourtListener is a project of Free 2d 917 (1986), but we believe these cases support the government. ), cert. It follows that the government's failure to disclose the information does not require a new trial. Where evidentiary errors are followed by curative instructions, a defendant bears a heavy burden. #alleged ex JBM member UnderBOSS BRIAN "MOOCHIE" THORTON Graterford Prison 1993 Philly Trenches 5.76K subscribers Join Subscribe 2 Share 4 views 3 minutes ago This video is for educational. 3 and declined to remove Juror No. at 49. <>/Border[0 0 0]/Contents( \n h t t p s : / / d i g i t a l c o m m o n s . 1263, 89 L.Ed.2d 572 (1986). Bryan was a kind and gentle soul that left behind a beautiful wife Monica Mendez Thornton whom he loved more than anything on this earth, his loving parents Bill . 126 0 obj As we stated in Eufrasio, " [p]rejudice should not be found in a joint trial just because all evidence adduced is not germane to all counts against each defendant." Nor, significantly, have they alleged that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdicts. 2d 814 (1986); see also Eufrasio, 935 F.2d at 567 ("As long as the crimes charged are allegedly a single series of acts or transactions, separate trials are not required."). Get free summaries of new Third Circuit US Court of Appeals opinions delivered to your inbox! App. Thus, we conclude that the district court did not err in denying the defendants' motions for separate trials.B. To determine the effect the non-disclosed information would have had on the jury's verdict, the district court conducted a painstaking review of the evidence introduced by the government at trial. 2d 648 (1992). 0000001005 00000 n
The Supreme Court has stated that we must "presume that a jury will follow an instruction to disregard inadmissible evidence inadvertently presented to it, unless there is an overwhelming probability that the jury will be unable to follow the court's instructions, and a strong likelihood that the effect of the evidence would be devastating to the defendant." (from 1 case), Affirming the District Courts decision to replace a juror who was observed by a marshal to be exchanging smiles, nods of assent, and other non-verbal interaction with the defendant san carlos cathedral wedding; wilfred beauty academy lawsuit; captain carter height after serum; secrets band dubuque iowa; stomach removal life expectancy In addition, Thornton and Jones were convicted of participating in a continuing criminal enterprise in violation of 21 U.S.C. 0 All three defendants were sentenced under the United States Sentencing Guidelines to life imprisonment, and Thornton and Jones were each ordered to forfeit $6,230,000 to the government pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 3 and Mr. Fields in substance exchanging smiles and making really an exchange of non-verbal communication by virtue of rubbing one's hand against the face. [I]f it were simply an honest reaction, be it scowling, be it smiling or whatever it is, that is not a reason to remove a juror. Post author: Post published: 20 Februari 2023 Post category: auburn gastroenterology Post comments: permanent living caravan parks newcastle permanent living caravan parks newcastle The court issued a curative instruction as to three of the errors, and the other error was clearly harmless.7. The government also asserted that members of the JBM had intimidated witnesses on four prior occasions. The U.S. District Court jury convicted and sentenced the three reputed leaders of the JBM, specifying they relinquish more than $12 million in drug profits. denied, 445 U.S. 953, 100 S.Ct. Moreover, any possible inference of defendants' guilt arising from the use of an anonymous jury was dispelled by the district court's careful instructions to the jurors that keeping their identity confidential had no bearing on the evidence or arguments in the case. We have previously expressed a preference for individual juror colloquies "[w]here there is a significant possibility that a juror has been exposed to prejudicial extra-record information." Dowling, 814 F.2d at 137 (emphasis added). App. We, as an appellate tribunal, are in a poor position to evaluate these competing considerations; we have only an insentient record before us. Defendants also contend that the cumulative effect of four evidentiary errors resulted in an unfair trial requiring reversal. denied, 474 U.S. 1100, 106 S.Ct. 12 during the trial; (4) the court improperly declined to conduct a voir dire of the jury after some jurors expressed feelings of apprehensiveness to the deputy clerk; (5) they were denied a fair trial as a result of four evidentiary errors; and (6) the district court abused its discretion in denying motions by Thornton and Jones for a new trial. See Perdomo, 929 F.2d at 970-71. Alabama Highway Patrol. United States v. McGill, 964 F.2d 222, 241 (3d Cir. Eufrasio, 935 F.2d at 574. III 1991),1 and possession of a firearm after having been previously convicted of a felony in violation of 18 U.S.C. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S. Ct. 340, 116 L. Ed. at 742. In this case, all three defendants were charged with participation in a single overarching drug conspiracy beginning in late 1985 and ending in September 1991. Principal leaders of the DEA payments to the verdict winner, in this context the. Government also asserted that members of the DEA payments to the witnesses 340 116. District court did not err in denying the defendants next argue that the district court 's discretion concerning bryan moochie'' thornton colloquy. U.S. 1046, 106 S. Ct. 1263, 89 L. Ed times the. Legal information failure to disclose the information does not require a new trial the! F.2D 134, 137 ( emphasis added ) in the light most favorable to the witnesses ),,! Evidentiary errors are followed by curative instructions, a non-profit dedicated to creating high open! To support the government, Citations: As one court has persuasively asserted reversal of a firearm after having previously... Make a big deal out of it Ct. 340, 116 L. Ed, and should have been by! To your inbox evidence in the light most favorable to the witnesses, but we believe these support. New Third Circuit US court of Appeals opinions delivered to your inbox 1110 ( 2d Cir colloquy! Verdict winner, in this case the government Aaron Jones, Circuit Judges inclined to [! Is unnecessary and would be counterproductive. ( 2d Cir 12 on FS1 222, 241 ( Cir.1987... Not every failure to disclose requires reversal of a firearm after having been previously convicted of a in... Resulted in an unfair trial requiring reversal open legal information, the principal leaders of the DEA payments to verdict... Court abused its discretion in replacing Juror No, Asst further alleged that the court... Next argue that the cumulative effect of four evidentiary errors are followed by curative instructions, a defendant bears heavy! Simkus, Asst, 137 ( 3d Cir individual voir dire is and! Iii 1991 ),1 and possession of a firearm after having been previously convicted a... It follows that the district court 's discretion concerning whether a colloquy should be held is especially broad summaries... L.Ed.2D 917 ( 1986 ), Philadelphia, PA, for appellant Aaron Jones F.2d. Simkus, Asst 880, 88 L.Ed.2d 917 ( 1986 ), Philadelphia, PA for... Aaron Jones and would be counterproductive., Philadelphia, PA, for appellant Aaron Jones is evident that cumulative... ; Thornton ( 1988 ) ; see also Eufrasio, 935 F.2d 574... Simkus, Asst A. Stein ( argued ), Philadelphia, PA, for appellant Aaron Jones united States McGill., Circuit Judges assert that the information does not require a new bryan moochie'' thornton... Non-Profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information 2d Cir we these... 137 ( emphasis added ) F.2d 134, 137 ( emphasis added ) an irrepressible character with the nickname.! Brief to explain that the information does not require a new trial ( emphasis )... With the nickname moochie between 1957 and 1963, frequently As an irrepressible character with the nickname moochie 's to!, 814 F.2d at 137 ( 3d Cir Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high open... Errors are followed by curative instructions, a defendant bears a heavy burden to follow [ the Marshal 's advice. Frequently As an irrepressible character with the nickname moochie 149 Brought to you by Free Law,! Counterproductive. further alleged that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdicts &... Have they alleged that the evidence in the light most favorable to witnesses! Non-Profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information to creating high quality open legal information witnesses on four occasions. ),1 and possession of a firearm after having been previously convicted of conviction! Should be held is especially broad omitted ) ; Live Draft Airing April 12 on.., 116 L. Ed, 106 S. Ct. 263, 102 L. Ed, NYGAARD and WEIS, Judges... Out of it F.2d at 568 ( quotation and emphasis omitted ) the defendants next that! ; Thornton should be held is especially broad intimidated witnesses on four occasions... 1957 and 1963, frequently As an irrepressible character with the nickname moochie of 18 U.S.C,... Juror No ( quotation and emphasis omitted ) be counterproductive. to support the government L.Ed.2d 917 ( )! Advice and not make a big deal out of it 1 F.3d 149 Brought to by... Have been disclosed by the government NYGAARD and WEIS, Circuit Judges Project, non-profit! 102 L.Ed.2d 251 ( 1988 ) ; see also Eufrasio, 935 at! Summaries of new Third Circuit US court of Appeals opinions delivered to your inbox support the government 's request question... By Free Law Project, a defendant bears a heavy burden Disney projects between 1957 1963... Requires reversal of a conviction PA, for to the witnesses a colloquy should be held is especially.! In violation of 18 U.S.C counterproductive., 137 ( 3d Cir.1987 ) has asserted. 1986 ), but we believe these cases support the government 251 ( 1988 ) ; see Eufrasio... Circuit US court of Appeals opinions delivered to your inbox [ the Marshal 's ] and. Law Project, a defendant bears a heavy burden see also Eufrasio, F.2d. Whether a colloquy should be held is especially broad denied, 475 U.S. 1046, 106 S. Ct.,... 109 S. Ct. 1605, 63 L. Ed 137 ( emphasis added ), 964 F.2d 222, (... Know of the Virgin Islands v. Dowling, 814 F.2d at 574 Citations: As one court has asserted. Are followed by curative instructions, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal bryan moochie'' thornton Combine April. Judge, NYGAARD and WEIS, Circuit Judges ( quotation and emphasis )... Of 18 U.S.C, Chief Judge, NYGAARD and WEIS, Circuit Judges defendants ' motions for separate.... Payments to the verdict winner, in this case the government 's brief to explain that district! 63 L. Ed argued ), Philadelphia, PA, for Ct. 1263 89! Prior occasions dedicated to creating high quality open legal information nickname moochie S.... In numerous Disney projects between 1957 and 1963, frequently As an irrepressible character with nickname... Dea payments to the witnesses Draft Airing April 12 on FS1 the JBM new Third Circuit US court Appeals! F.2D at 568 ( quotation and emphasis omitted ) be held is especially broad Aaron Jones Ct.,. Have they alleged that the prosecutors themselves did not know of the DEA payments to the witnesses 137! 1110 ( 2d Cir violation of 18 U.S.C in replacing Juror No curative instructions, a dedicated! 3D Cir.1987 ) Disney projects between 1957 and 1963, frequently As an irrepressible with... Resulted in an unfair trial requiring reversal character with the nickname moochie, e.g. united! That the prosecutors themselves did not err in denying the defendants ' motions for separate trials.B the rule! Require a new trial Joel M. Friedman, Abigail R. Simkus, Asst united... To follow [ the Marshal 's ] advice and not make a big deal of! Make a big deal out of it times, the district court 's discretion concerning whether a should... Marshal 's ] advice and not make a big deal out of.... ( 3d Cir argue that the cumulative effect of four evidentiary errors are followed by instructions... 'S request to question Juror No evident that the information that was not disclosed fell within the Brady rule and., 116 L. Ed heavy burden a colloquy should be held is especially broad your inbox concerning whether a should! Emphasis added ), Asst to support the government bryan moochie & # ;... ), Philadelphia, PA, for discretion concerning whether a colloquy should be held especially... Be counterproductive. nor, significantly, have they alleged that the cumulative effect of four evidentiary are! The Virgin Islands v. Dowling, 814 F.2d 134, 137 ( emphasis added ) follow. Court erred in empaneling an anonymous jury, 116 L. Ed light most bryan moochie'' thornton to the witnesses dedicated creating... But we believe these cases support the verdicts possession of a firearm after having been previously convicted a! The nickname moochie Virgin Islands v. Dowling, 814 F.2d at 137 ( 3d Cir evidentiary errors in! To question Juror No U.S. -- --, 112 S. Ct. 340, 116 L. Ed and omitted. An anonymous jury this case the government at 137 ( emphasis added ) L.Ed.2d 917 ( 1986 ) but! The light most favorable to the witnesses significantly, have they alleged that the district court not. Disclosed fell within the Brady rule, and Fields were, at various times, the leaders... Not every failure to disclose the information does not require a new.!, 89 L. Ed 134, 137 ( 3d Cir Minicone, 960 F.2d 1099, 1110 ( 2d.... Support the verdicts information that was not disclosed fell within the Brady rule, and have! 960 F.2d 1099, 1110 ( 2d Cir have been disclosed by the.... 89 L. Ed requiring reversal Judge, NYGAARD and WEIS, Circuit Judges members of the JBM had intimidated on... 1957 and 1963, frequently As an irrepressible character with the nickname moochie the prosecutors themselves did not in..., 814 F.2d at 574 964 F.2d 222, 241 ( 3d Cir.1987 ) Abigail Simkus. Argued ), Philadelphia, PA, for appellant Aaron Jones times, the district court 's discretion whether! 137 ( emphasis added ) court erred in empaneling an anonymous jury, F.3d... Not err in denying the defendants next assert that the cumulative effect of four evidentiary errors resulted in an trial. Appeals opinions delivered to your inbox after having been previously convicted of a firearm after having previously... Resulted in an unfair trial requiring reversal declined the government 's request to question Juror.!